Aquinas wrote:Seat ALuthori - 5
Endralon - 4
Dorvik - 3
Aloria - 1
Dundorf - 1
Hobrazia - 1
Kirlawa - 1
Malivia - 1
Rutania - 1
Whahaha, feel the might of the two Pelicans! Handy dandy a cultural link with Endralon. If Endralon wins New Endralon's interests will be represented for sure!
TheTsar wrote:I think we should just have the 6 great powers (according to the RP accord) be the permanent members, and another 6 are elected by the nations. What do you think?
I disagree, Trigunia has little to no support for the SC. Hutori and Talmoria are rocking and even I had more votes then Trigunia has, ofcourse that ended when I gave my full support to Hutori.
Whilst I understand this wasn't a question for me, personally, I'd like to register my opposition to this idea. There has to be a balance between realism and fairness. Obviously, there is a bias with both of us in this scenario but I ask do you really think it's fair that a nation like Indrala, where the single party hasn't even voted for themselves, should be automatically given a seat over a nation like Hutori (or Kalistan) where several parties are actively campaigning for their seat? In my opinion, that would be extremely harsh on players who choose to play in poorer/less-developed/weaker nations.
I agree
Looking at what has been going on so far, it looks like some players/parties/nations may be taking into account the RP Accord rankings - at least to a degree, anyway. Indrala seems to have picked up nominations rather effortlessly, for example.
This is certaintly true. Though strategic voting musnt be forgotten. We voted for Indrala at first because they are our allies (and they are a superpower) but we voted for Hutori out of fear that Trigunia might win the D seat for example.