I think the game, to improve its realism and to simulate more political/institutional mechanincs and situation (particracy is a political simualtion!), needs of an Impeachment system.
What is the point to be immovable on the position to defend always the mechanincs game when the mechanincs' development were never finished?
What if, for example, an elected president doesn't present a cabinet also when a party or a group of parties gained the majority and asked to the president to present a cabinet? In what kind of political system (at least democratic) doesn't existe an Impeachment system?
Where is the democracy, and the realism, when in a POLITICAL GAME doesn't exist any form of Impeachment? The elections are not a fair way to solve such a situation! Why 4 or 5 players/parties should risk to lost their majority, democratically elected, for the behavior of another player who control the Presidency? And what is the point to follow like foundamentalists some mechanics that are simply incomplete? Because, as said, a political game without an Impachment system is ridicoulus, especially when in IRL there many nations where an Impeachment doesn't means automatically an early election! And I'm cpnvinced that the creator of the game never added such an option only because he left the game.
The game already provides a lot of RP variables and RP's way to act. Why not delineate also some political mechanism in RP and first of all the case of an Impeachment for the president? With a majority of 2/3 into the game it is possible to dethronize a monarchs, why not create an RP constitutional provision to allow a form of Impeachment if 2/3 of the players agree on this? What could happen?
And this time it is possible have a response from the mods, the creator, from someone?
Not like this other topic: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7185 (thank you for the attention). I'll create the same topic also in the section Moderatin, hoping to begin a costructive dialogue and not a simple: "the rules don't allow it".
Thank you