Consultation on Different Population Caps

General discussions about the Particracy web game.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby Kubrick » Tue Jun 05, 2018 10:38 pm

Polites, you did not add the extra -12- inhabitants for Vanuku. It's almost like Zanz is a mod again, smh.
Crown Party (Kroon Partij / Kronuz Prta) - Vanuku (Active)
National Front (Acies Nationalis) - Selucia (Inactive)
The Radicals (Die Radikalen) - Dorvik (Inactive)
User avatar
Kubrick
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:47 pm

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby CCP » Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:05 pm

I concur with Kubrick regarding the 12 Vanukeans.
CCP
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:24 am

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby cm9777 » Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:11 pm

CCP wrote:I concur with Kubrick regarding the 12 Vanukeans.



Indeed. Extremely disappointed in the GRC and Polites for leaving these twelve Vandeukans in the list. I’d like to see you all in my office later today. We will discuss disciplinary action.
Nationale Liberale Partei Inactive

Dundorfische Nationalistisches Allianz Inactive

Federalistische Partei Inactive

Patriot Party Inactive

Modrá Thalleristická Aliancia Active

Moderation
cm9777
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:05 pm

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby Polites » Wed Jun 06, 2018 7:16 am

I guess I have no choice but to dishonorably resign over this.
Me pinguem et nitidum bene curata cute vises,
Cum ridere voles, Epicuri de grege porcum
Polites
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby Kubrick » Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:17 pm

Thank you all for the support against this unwarranted tyranny of the evil Romanian.
Crown Party (Kroon Partij / Kronuz Prta) - Vanuku (Active)
National Front (Acies Nationalis) - Selucia (Inactive)
The Radicals (Die Radikalen) - Dorvik (Inactive)
User avatar
Kubrick
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:47 pm

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby Martinulus » Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:56 pm

Is it actually finalised yet? Because according to the sheet Hulstria would be the densest country in the world. Since Hulstria is quite a mountainous nation, that'd mean there'd be even more people crammed into the flatter parts of the country. I was wondering at what point it would start being unrealistic to do so, so input on that would be welcome!

EDIT: For reference, I think it would mean that the population density in the lower-lying areas of H&GS would be about as high as the one in the Netherlands. That would mean a Crownland like Budenlar or Kuratha would be one big agglomeration. Not to mention the fact that Mitrania, which is in the middle of the mountains, is the most populous Crownland, which would make conditions in Syakusen rather unliveable if we maintain the same mean population density.
Image
Hosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund - Hulstria and Gao-Soto

Notable previous parties:
Folkepartiet (People's Party) - Kazulia
User avatar
Martinulus
 
Posts: 952
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 11:53 am

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby lewiselder1 » Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:32 pm

Martinulus wrote:Is it actually finalised yet? Because according to the sheet Hulstria would be the densest country in the world. Since Hulstria is quite a mountainous nation, that'd mean there'd be even more people crammed into the flatter parts of the country. I was wondering at what point it would start being unrealistic to do so, so input on that would be welcome!

EDIT: For reference, I think it would mean that the population density in the lower-lying areas of H&GS would be about as high as the one in the Netherlands. That would mean a Crownland like Budenlar or Kuratha would be one big agglomeration. Not to mention the fact that Mitrania, which is in the middle of the mountains, is the most populous Crownland, which would make conditions in Syakusen rather unliveable if we maintain the same mean population density.


Fair points, we will take a look into it :) we shall also be looking at sekowo I think.
Moderation

aka Lewis
User avatar
lewiselder1
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu May 04, 2017 8:35 pm

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby Polites » Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:29 am

So after consulting with a few players with a history in Hulstria and Sekowo, we've amended the populations for those two nations, Hulstria to 101,966,772 and Sekowo to 67,219,341. So the current proposed numbers are as follows:

Indrala: 284,875,536
Malivia: 203,397,251
Istalia: 146,694,525
Talmoria: 139,431,327
Dorvik: 133,203,018
Aldegar: 130,495,554
Dundorf: 124,321,515
Valruzia: 124,201,950
Trigunia: 121,536,015
Luthori: 121,292,100
New Endralon: 119,736,352
Hawu Mumenhes: 116,361,591
Lourenne: 109,156,419
Baltusia: 102,195,322
Hulstria: 101,966,772
Rutania: 100,712,651
Vanuku: 100,459,068
Tukarali: 99,086,778
Mordusia: 94,744,518
Selucia: 93,580,142
Lodamun: 86,761,485
Beluzia: 85,343,517
Zardugal: 81,140,960
Deltaria: 79,371,977
Kalistan: 74,254,423
Narikaton: 71,494,345
Endralon: 69,452,571
Sekowo: 67,219,341
Hutori: 65,815,242
Pontesi: 59,936,717
Kanjor: 56,997,456
Likatonia: 54,919,695
Kazulia: 54,522,933
Hobrazia: 52,213,117
Jakania: 50,993,654
Barmenistan: 50,976,332
Cildania: 48,025,825
Kundrati: 46,186,284
Gaduridos: 43,601,839
Kalopia: 43,583,317
Beiteynu: 41,289,613
Egelion: 40,890,141
Cobura: 40,217,509
Saridan: 39,200,195
Solentia: 38,447,848
Badara: 36,176,257
Dolgava: 35,262,248
Alduria: 28,345,365
Rildanor: 26,997,456
Dankuk: 26,557,632
Aloria: 23,784,559
Kafuristan: 23,257,903
Telamon: 21,351,904
Jelbania: 18,409,031
Klavia Okeano: 17,731,494
Kirlawa: 15,745,551
Vorona: 13,910,152
Davostan: 13,207,205
Me pinguem et nitidum bene curata cute vises,
Cum ridere voles, Epicuri de grege porcum
Polites
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby Maxington » Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:38 am

My question to the players is why should Kazulia's population be at its proposed number? What is the justification behind that? What is the justification behind all of these other countries having smaller populations than nations that should not have larger populations? What is the thinking that goes behind that?
"The future of the Nation is in the children's school bags" ~ Dr. Eric Williams
President of the Trond Henrichsen Institute for International Affairs.
User avatar
Maxington
 
Posts: 2169
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: Look Behind you.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

Postby lewiselder1 » Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:08 pm

Maxington wrote:My question to the players is why should Kazulia's population be at its proposed number? What is the justification behind that? What is the justification behind all of these other countries having smaller populations than nations that should not have larger populations? What is the thinking that goes behind that?


I thought you wanted it at this number? Are you suggesting it should be higher? Personally I’m of the opinion it should be, but it seems to be somewhat of a hotly contested issue and this isn’t exactly my specialty!
Moderation

aka Lewis
User avatar
lewiselder1
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu May 04, 2017 8:35 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests