Page 4 of 5

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2018 10:38 pm
by Kubrick
Polites, you did not add the extra -12- inhabitants for Vanuku. It's almost like Zanz is a mod again, smh.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:05 pm
by CCP
I concur with Kubrick regarding the 12 Vanukeans.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:11 pm
by cm9777
CCP wrote:I concur with Kubrick regarding the 12 Vanukeans.



Indeed. Extremely disappointed in the GRC and Polites for leaving these twelve Vandeukans in the list. I’d like to see you all in my office later today. We will discuss disciplinary action.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 7:16 am
by Polites
I guess I have no choice but to dishonorably resign over this.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:17 pm
by Kubrick
Thank you all for the support against this unwarranted tyranny of the evil Romanian.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:56 pm
by Martinulus
Is it actually finalised yet? Because according to the sheet Hulstria would be the densest country in the world. Since Hulstria is quite a mountainous nation, that'd mean there'd be even more people crammed into the flatter parts of the country. I was wondering at what point it would start being unrealistic to do so, so input on that would be welcome!

EDIT: For reference, I think it would mean that the population density in the lower-lying areas of H&GS would be about as high as the one in the Netherlands. That would mean a Crownland like Budenlar or Kuratha would be one big agglomeration. Not to mention the fact that Mitrania, which is in the middle of the mountains, is the most populous Crownland, which would make conditions in Syakusen rather unliveable if we maintain the same mean population density.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:32 pm
by lewiselder1
Martinulus wrote:Is it actually finalised yet? Because according to the sheet Hulstria would be the densest country in the world. Since Hulstria is quite a mountainous nation, that'd mean there'd be even more people crammed into the flatter parts of the country. I was wondering at what point it would start being unrealistic to do so, so input on that would be welcome!

EDIT: For reference, I think it would mean that the population density in the lower-lying areas of H&GS would be about as high as the one in the Netherlands. That would mean a Crownland like Budenlar or Kuratha would be one big agglomeration. Not to mention the fact that Mitrania, which is in the middle of the mountains, is the most populous Crownland, which would make conditions in Syakusen rather unliveable if we maintain the same mean population density.


Fair points, we will take a look into it :) we shall also be looking at sekowo I think.

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:29 am
by Polites
So after consulting with a few players with a history in Hulstria and Sekowo, we've amended the populations for those two nations, Hulstria to 101,966,772 and Sekowo to 67,219,341. So the current proposed numbers are as follows:

Indrala: 284,875,536
Malivia: 203,397,251
Istalia: 146,694,525
Talmoria: 139,431,327
Dorvik: 133,203,018
Aldegar: 130,495,554
Dundorf: 124,321,515
Valruzia: 124,201,950
Trigunia: 121,536,015
Luthori: 121,292,100
New Endralon: 119,736,352
Hawu Mumenhes: 116,361,591
Lourenne: 109,156,419
Baltusia: 102,195,322
Hulstria: 101,966,772
Rutania: 100,712,651
Vanuku: 100,459,068
Tukarali: 99,086,778
Mordusia: 94,744,518
Selucia: 93,580,142
Lodamun: 86,761,485
Beluzia: 85,343,517
Zardugal: 81,140,960
Deltaria: 79,371,977
Kalistan: 74,254,423
Narikaton: 71,494,345
Endralon: 69,452,571
Sekowo: 67,219,341
Hutori: 65,815,242
Pontesi: 59,936,717
Kanjor: 56,997,456
Likatonia: 54,919,695
Kazulia: 54,522,933
Hobrazia: 52,213,117
Jakania: 50,993,654
Barmenistan: 50,976,332
Cildania: 48,025,825
Kundrati: 46,186,284
Gaduridos: 43,601,839
Kalopia: 43,583,317
Beiteynu: 41,289,613
Egelion: 40,890,141
Cobura: 40,217,509
Saridan: 39,200,195
Solentia: 38,447,848
Badara: 36,176,257
Dolgava: 35,262,248
Alduria: 28,345,365
Rildanor: 26,997,456
Dankuk: 26,557,632
Aloria: 23,784,559
Kafuristan: 23,257,903
Telamon: 21,351,904
Jelbania: 18,409,031
Klavia Okeano: 17,731,494
Kirlawa: 15,745,551
Vorona: 13,910,152
Davostan: 13,207,205

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:38 am
by Maxington
My question to the players is why should Kazulia's population be at its proposed number? What is the justification behind that? What is the justification behind all of these other countries having smaller populations than nations that should not have larger populations? What is the thinking that goes behind that?

Re: Consultation on Different Population Caps

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:08 pm
by lewiselder1
Maxington wrote:My question to the players is why should Kazulia's population be at its proposed number? What is the justification behind that? What is the justification behind all of these other countries having smaller populations than nations that should not have larger populations? What is the thinking that goes behind that?


I thought you wanted it at this number? Are you suggesting it should be higher? Personally I’m of the opinion it should be, but it seems to be somewhat of a hotly contested issue and this isn’t exactly my specialty!