Page 2 of 2

Re: Security Council

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:09 am
by Reddy
I agree with Aquinas fully. It would be wise to make allowance for the holidays for everyone.

Re: Security Council

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:12 am
by cm9777
-

Re: Security Council

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 4:57 pm
by Polites
Hey guys, I just noticed Vanuku is an option for Seat B. But Vanuku is a Great Power under the new rankings so is guaranteed a seat as Permanent Member. Does this mean that votes will no longer be reset in future and all nations will remain options regardless of their ranking status, or was this an oversight?
Thanks

Re: Security Council

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 5:26 pm
by Aquinas
Polites wrote:Hey guys, I just noticed Vanuku is an option for Seat B. But Vanuku is a Great Power under the new rankings so is guaranteed a seat as Permanent Member. Does this mean that votes will no longer be reset in future and all nations will remain options regardless of their ranking status, or was this an oversight?
Thanks


viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8304

Auditorii wrote:7. Reintroduction of Great Powers to voting: While the removal of Great Powers from the pool of candidates was an overall good idea, the overall implementation is problematic if Great Powers change in the rankings. As is the case with Dorvik and Istalia. I suggested and have been heard that every nation be in their respective seats, if a Great Power has the most votes they are given to the runner up.

Re: Security Council

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 5:49 pm
by Polites
Ah thanks, I missed that.