Page 3 of 10

Re: PT Classic Population Information (Updated: 04/24/2020)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 4:46 pm
by Auditorii
QV73 wrote:any updates?


I'm going to sit down tonight and re do the pop numbers for the third world and tweak the TW rankings while I'm at it.

Re: PT Classic Population Information (Updated: 04/24/2020)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 4:52 pm
by Pragma
excellent, thank you!

Re: PT Classic Population Information (Updated: 04/24/2020)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:11 pm
by Auditorii
QV73 wrote:excellent, thank you!


I've updated all of the population numbers. I used this as a reference combined with some readings of TW newspapers, combined with some wiki trolling. Generally the numbers have gone up in some spots, one or two went down. I believe the only one I'll wait and see what happens with is if Wu manages to get around to his merger between Hazen and I believe Ntoto?

Re: PT Classic Population Information (Updated: 04/24/2020)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:54 pm
by Pragma
400 MILLION PRAISE SHIVA
Image

Re: PT Classic Population Information (Updated: 04/24/2020)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:57 pm
by Auditorii
I get that a lot.

Update to the Global Populations: Consultations

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:57 pm
by colonelvesica
As Noted Here Terra's population were reshuffled almost a full year ago, and as part of a renewed plan I plan on updating these numbers.

So I invite everyone to weigh in one the populations and possible changes that would have occured to your nation as a matter of your total population.

Consultations are officially open.

Re: Update to the Global Populations: Consultations

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 4:34 pm
by Pragma
I can only really speak for the countries I am familiar with, which at this point are New Englia and Vascania. For me, both of these countries have population figures in line with what I would expect and I don't see their population needing to be changed to any significant degree.

Re: Update to the Global Populations: Consultations

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 8:44 pm
by ChitinKal
Liore's population should have increased slightly as a result of industrialization and urbanization over a century, though not by a dramatic amount. If I have the previous population figures correct, could possibly be around 50 mil.

Re: Update to the Global Populations: Consultations

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 9:32 pm
by colonelvesica
I received some feedback from Augustus and wanted to double the Davostani population, through a combination of government encouraged subsidies, and and Kivonian Warrior Cultures encouraging multiple wives, so the Davostani population would be between 25 and 28 million

Re: Update to the Global Populations: Consultations

PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2021 2:16 am
by jamescfm
When I was playing in Jakania, I felt the population should probably have been higher given that it is based on Turkey. I think this could be reasonably explained in terms of contemporary developments (a period of relative prosperity and urbanisation), I would favour a figure somewhere between 53 and 56 million. Given the devastating nature of the conflict in Rapa Pile, perhaps the Pilese population should fall a little (maybe around 4.5 million) as a result of deaths and emigration.

As a side note, I believe that the population figures should be moved from the current spreadsheet to a thread on the forum, something I raised with Farsun while I was Moderator. The current document is messy, difficult to navigate and in some cases just flat inaccurate. For example, the information page has no country as "least populated" and Yingdala as "most populated" while some of the countries are named spuriously ("Kalopia-Wantuni", "Hawu-Ikradon" or "Dankuk/Kyoseon").

Normally mistakes like these could be fixed by a co-Moderator but only Farsun can access the spreadsheet which means we are relying on him to do it (which never happened when I asked). Aside from that, I just would prefer not to have to leave the forum to look at population figures and at the moment, they are displayed much clearer on the relevant wiki page. I appreciate that this is not the explicit purpose of this thread but an update to the figures would be an opportune time to fix the problem.