bfmvivi wrote:A Socialist wrote:Interesting, I would be willing to debate some people if they wanted.
Ill debate you, if PresM gives us a topic.
George wrote:I challenge Darvian.
AdJeCtIv3 wrote:How about a rule that you have to argue the opposite of your 'political profile' here?
E.g. William Reynolds arguing for abolition of the Monarchy, or myself arguing that unfettered capitalism is the only true path to wealth and universal healthcare is inefficient and an example of creeping socialism?
Darvian wrote:George wrote:I challenge Darvian.
On? Someone has to keep this game running you know, not sure I have time to manhandle you in a debate.
A Socialist wrote:bfmvivi wrote:A Socialist wrote:Interesting, I would be willing to debate some people if they wanted.
Ill debate you, if PresM gives us a topic.
Agreed, I will debate if when PresM gives a topic.
George wrote:Darvian wrote:George wrote:I challenge Darvian.
On? Someone has to keep this game running you know, not sure I have time to manhandle you in a debate.
It won't take long until you recognize my superiority. Anyhow, seriously now, no appropriate subject pops out of my mind now...sadly. And we are not very different in our views.
YankeeHater wrote:If the New York Yankees were aligned with a sith lord, they would've won a few world series in the past ten years or so, so no they are not in league with a sith.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests