Captain-Socialist wrote:Your icon Gaddafi is the product of Arab conquest of the Maghreb peoples, which is a perfect example of the extremely complicated two-way assimilation over centuries that is much more common than cultural genocide.
My icon?
J94CK wrote:I actually agree with you about councils having more power (if that's what you mean; local government in the UK is a mess in my opinion and needs reform), and England having its own parliament.
No; I'm talking about Scottish parliament and Welsh parliament, not local government in terms of mayors and councillors.
J94CK wrote:Siggon Kristov wrote:I'd prefer to see it like the USA, but I think the supporters of "Scottish independence" are more for either a republic.
Doing it like Canada or Jamaica would be in the middle.
Even the SNP - who used to want a republic and literally orgasm over the prospect of 'President Alex Salmond' - have said that they'd keep the Queen, although I read something ridiculous today which said that the Church of Scotland would require a monarch to be crowned in Scotland too if it became independent.
I guess they forgot what the "United Kingdom" and the Union Jack were all about.
J94CK wrote:I think it would be best for Scotland to keep the monarch as head of state (I think a majority of people in Scotland like the monarchy than dislike).
Significant countries like Australia and Canada have kept the monarchy as head of state and its worked well for them so I think it'd be in Scotland's interests.
However, there are probably some people in Scotland who'd like to see it do a 'Republic of Ireland' and ditch the monarchy and leave the Commonwealth.
Well, if that's what they want, let them have it I guess
J94CK wrote:Jamaica is another matter, isn't it going down the road to republicanism?
Yes, but when I mentioned it here, I was referring to the changes in 1962 where it became independent (independent government, but still under the crown).