http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/a ... -1.2058482
Time to ignore CNN for the next few months because this is all it will cover....
PaleRider wrote:http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/airasia-flight-carrying-162-passengers-missing-officials-article-1.2058482
Time to ignore CNN for the next few months because this is all it will cover....
soysauce wrote:Airbus jets have a very good record, last time one went down over the ocean was when one of the pilots violated almost every rule in the book and failed to recover from a stall that he shouldn't have got himself into in the first place. Coincidentally it was also trying to avoid a storm at the time.
I'm guessing that the pitot tube iced up and the autopilot disengaged, after that the pilots probably got disorientated and screwed up while hand flying at altitude. I've heard Airbuses don't handle stalls well so maybe that's got something to do with it, especially if the pilot didn't have an accurate airspeed.
CanadianEh wrote:soysauce wrote:Airbus jets have a very good record, last time one went down over the ocean was when one of the pilots violated almost every rule in the book and failed to recover from a stall that he shouldn't have got himself into in the first place. Coincidentally it was also trying to avoid a storm at the time.
I'm guessing that the pitot tube iced up and the autopilot disengaged, after that the pilots probably got disorientated and screwed up while hand flying at altitude. I've heard Airbuses don't handle stalls well so maybe that's got something to do with it, especially if the pilot didn't have an accurate airspeed.
If you have two panicked or inexperienced pilots the likeliness of them handling a stall correctly is very slim especially if they are close to the ground. Don't get me wrong stalls are handled all of the time but when you have a panicked cabin and your altitude is low, you might not be able to overcome it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests