MichaelReilly wrote:Lionking wrote:A Palestinian state could have existed in 1948! but nooooo, that tiny strip that the Jews would have was a torn in the eye of the Islamic fascists (Yes Islamic Fascists, many Islamic leaders in Palestine sided up with Hitler and Praised Him). If Palestine should be a state according to many of it's neighbors, then why didn't Egypt and Jordan gave their independence while they occupied Gaza and West-Bank? Why nobody of the Arab World shouted Fascism and death to Egypt and Jordan during that time? The harsh reality is as followed; The Arab world gambled and failed miserably with their wars against Israel. Israel defended themselves and gained ground on their neighbors. That's war and that's life. The Arabs should look at themselves, as they are the only ones that are guilty for this current situation.
And what we see here ladies and gentlemen, is the unbelievably warped and downright false reading on Middle East history that has resulted in morons across the globe supporting poor, victimised Israel against those evil fascist Arab aggressors.
What's wrong with that statement? Is it NOT true that the Arabs wanted to drive the Jews into the sea and massacre their people? Is it not true that the Arabs squandered an opportunity to help a Palestinian state arise when they had direct control of the land in question between 1948 and 1967? Is it not true that the Arabs, using the Three No's of Khartoum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khartoum_Resolution ) thereby rejected, when Israel was willing to bargain off the land it had taken, any attempt to negotiate with Israel? Israel was willing to trade land for peace, as it did with Egypt in 1979 when it returned the Sinai when a peace treaty came about.
How is the above, an " unbelievably warped and downright false reading on Middle East history?" Please enlighten us Mr Reilly. And GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!