jamescfm wrote:Axxell wrote:If we go to analyze in deep the term fascist, ok, Wilders is not fascist.
In what way is he not fascist?
Axxell wrote:Economic liberalism, less state and burocracy, absence of reactionary or denominational positions on civil rights and liberties, for the dutch.
Axxell wrote:Economic liberalism, less state and burocracy, absence of reactionary or denominational positions on civil rights and liberties, for the white dutch.
jamescfm wrote:Axxell wrote:jamescfm wrote:In what way is he not fascist?
Economic liberalism, less state and burocracy, absence of reactionary or denominational positions on civil rights and liberties, for the dutch.
But yes, he shows positions and tendences (xenophobia and nationalism) that we can judge as fascist, in the "general sense" of the term.
Surely you're not being serious? How can you suggest that he is in favour of 'less state' when we know he wants mosques shut down and the Koran confiscated. Likewise, economic liberalism and nationalism are somewhat opposed. If you support liberal economics, you would support measures like free movement of labour, goods and services- Wilders certainly does not.
MarkWill wrote:Axxell wrote:Economic liberalism, less state and burocracy, absence of reactionary or denominational positions on civil rights and liberties, for the dutch.Axxell wrote:Economic liberalism, less state and burocracy, absence of reactionary or denominational positions on civil rights and liberties, for the white dutch.
There, I fixed it for you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests