Hrafn wrote:I wrote:What's next, a ban on cutting off a piece of an infant's dick?
Iceland beats you to it:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/18/iceland-ban-male-circumcision-first-european-country
Well done Iceland
Hrafn wrote:I wrote:What's next, a ban on cutting off a piece of an infant's dick?
Iceland beats you to it:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/18/iceland-ban-male-circumcision-first-european-country
Elf wrote:Meh. Seems like a symbolic issue for dogmatic secularists and people who view it as something that looks ugly and is done by "the other" (Jews/Muslims), while not reflecting whenever ear rings on little kids is any more natural of course. There's absolutely no proof of circumcision being harmful in any way, rather the opposite.
Elf wrote:Meh. Seems like a symbolic issue for dogmatic secularists and people who view it as something that looks ugly and is done by "the other" (Jews/Muslims), while not reflecting whenever ear rings on little kids is any more natural of course. There's absolutely no proof of circumcision being harmful in any way, rather the opposite.
Elf wrote:I have a foreskin, and I can guarantee those who haven't got one, that you're not really missing anything lol.
Elf wrote:Jews should feel confident that their religion can be practised in Europe without restrictions.
Yeh, I know. I even put a on it on facebook.Hrafn wrote:Also, Paula Bieler, a jewish Sweden Democrat politician, has applauded Iceland's anti-circ bill on social media.
The irony
Elf wrote:It's not about being "pro-" or "anti-" circumcision in general. I have no desire to get circumcised. It's just that there aren't any really compelling reasons to ban it
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest