[quote="George S.K]
No disagreements with that, but in this "virtual world" we still have laws and the like. We exist, time exists and space defines us. So within this world I try to understand that we cannot understand the real concept of things (the one I explained and which I believe in about the universe) and therefore I refuse the existence of God and accept that after death I fall into nonexistence. But that doesn't stop me from living.[/quote]
Of course we are still living, so indeed something must be happening at the time, but this has nothing to do with us understanding what happens. But if we aren't able to understand the real concept, this doesn't mean our theories aren't right, it just means they aren't verifiable, and thus it all comes down to believing rather than knowing. And if it is indeed so, then nobody can say that a God doesn't or cannot exist, he can only believe. He can search for certain indicators to help him rationalise his belief, but he can never truly know. And it's the same vice versa, of course - there can never be absolute proof of God's existence, just as there is no absolute proof of anything at all (after one, even that 1+1 = 2 is nothing but an established theory).
What I mean is that, by saying that a greater concept of the Universe can never be fully, or even a little, understood, you can only justify that you believe that there is no God, but it doesn't make your belief a necessary truth.
By the way, the idea of us never being able to fully know a thing is what I always thought to be what your own Socrates meant by his famous quote (which I know only in German, and I heavily regret not having learned ancient Greek in school).
And in your statement, the everything still cannot be defined, nor the possible or the verifiable. We just align the words, give a certain meaning to them and add our own personal concept of it. Still we can't define "personal" so basically it's a headache. I don't know if anyone understands me at this point because I am beginning to lose myself as well. But it's fascinating. I'd love to hear your view Amazeroth.
I fear that I don't fully understand what you mean by this. By definition, do you mean only the linguistic one, or do you mean definition itself as something that can never be fully done?