Particracy Forum

jamescfm wrote:Glad to see that all those old treaties were cleared out. Jakania recently withdrew from some old ones to which it was the only party so here a few eligible for clearout.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4364
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4361
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4345

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4329
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4319
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4235

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4233
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4225
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4222

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4160
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4032
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4030

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4028
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3953
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3787

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3621
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3310
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=1895

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... eatyid=365
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4491
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4462

All done!

Don't know if this counts under the rules, since it's new, but uhh...

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4574

"Princpals" isn't a word, and so I created a new version of the treaty without spelling errors; thus, this one is unnecessary.

Thanks!

Wu Han wrote:Don't know if this counts under the rules, since it's new, but uhh...

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4574

"Princpals" isn't a word, and so I created a new version of the treaty without spelling errors; thus, this one is unnecessary.

Thanks!

Removed, thank you

Can you delate this treaty? http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4614

I made a mistake in clicking on Ratification process.

I already created a new treaty but still as draft.

Thank you

XanderOne wrote:Can you delate this treaty? http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4614

I made a mistake in clicking on Ratification process.

I already created a new treaty but still as draft.

Thank you

Removed.

Auditorii wrote:

XanderOne wrote:Can you delate this treaty? http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4614

I made a mistake in clicking on Ratification process.

I already created a new treaty but still as draft.

Thank you

Removed.

Sorry but it's still there the treaty: http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4614

Done.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4534
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4547
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4536
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4674

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4576
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4582
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4603
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=4689

consider these for deletion

Both "N-S4817 Diplomatic Relations Act" and "A mutual defense agreement between the state of Badara and the state of Kafuristan" are not yet old enough to be eligible for deletion (they must be at least fifty in-game years old). The rest have been removed.