http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... tyid=31318it logged two days ago, after other two days of inactivity. Already two days ago 3 players asked me to demand the inactivation of that party, than the player logged and protested, so, I didn't present the request on the forum.
But now, it passed another two days and the player after the protests about the menaced early deactivation still didn't logged and again this morning players in Istalia are asking for the party inactivation due to the fact that in Istalia for months there have been players that are active more than on daily-basis. The PRI's players underlined how these delays in the log in are blocking the normal gameplay and the development of any RP.
Now, with the new rules I even don't know if still exist the position of Nationmaster, I noticed that now there are less cases to propose the deactivation of a party and so, now I don't know if I can simply say:
"Nationmaster request: the player didn't log in for 2 days"However, I think that the current situation reflect this provision:
"v. Similar offence not covered by the above rules, but do not contribute to the gameplay to the satisfaction of other players. Communication must be attempted with the player before discussing with the Moderation over this."The dissatisfaction of all the players has been clearly showed and presented to the player, on the nation message board and under another bill and the player didn't give us justification for this delays in the log in, a part "why do you want deactivate me?". We are proposing to the player also the development of an RP involving its party (due to the IC nature of the party), but a part a vague "ok", no other news.
Some parties also feared an attempt of sabotage of the Istalia gameplay.
But, a part all this, to conclude: the player's delays in the log in is causing dissatisfaction for the other players, me too.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:41 am