Page 328 of 558

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2018 12:17 pm
by cm9777
Done

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 2:47 pm
by Dino9932

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:10 pm
by Adithya

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:48 pm
by Polites
Done. Second party is already inactive.

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:18 pm
by Zanz

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:21 pm
by lewiselder1
MODERATION uses INACTIVATE. It's super effective!

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 3:16 pm
by CiviixXXX

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:38 pm
by House Spencer
lewiselder1 wrote:MODERATION uses INACTIVATE. It's super effective!


Ya don't I know it

You have to be so flippant? Inactivation can be not that nice a thing just sayin

Another Jelbanian gone

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:42 pm
by lewiselder1
CiviixXXX wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=34874


And just like that, they were gone.

House Spencer wrote:
lewiselder1 wrote:MODERATION uses INACTIVATE. It's super effective!


Ya don't I know it

You have to be so flippant? Inactivation can be not that nice a thing just sayin

Another Jelbanian gone


Just a bit of harmless fun. This was an inactivation based on inactivity under rule 5.c.i; a fairly common occurrence, not an unexpected one, and one in all likelihood applied to somebody who isn't playing the game currently, a purely practical concern not based on their behaviour and nothing personal... In other words, I think this was rather inoffensive. I'm hardly mocking them, I'm just spicing up a menial task with a more menial "Done" and replacing it with something a little less boring.

Tl;dr: I'm afraid I disagree.

Re: Party Inactivation Requests

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:58 pm
by House Spencer
lewiselder1 wrote:
CiviixXXX wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=34874


And just like that, they were gone.

House Spencer wrote:
lewiselder1 wrote:MODERATION uses INACTIVATE. It's super effective!


Ya don't I know it

You have to be so flippant? Inactivation can be not that nice a thing just sayin

Another Jelbanian gone


Just a bit of harmless fun. This was an inactivation based on inactivity under rule 5.c.i; a fairly common occurrence, not an unexpected one, and one in all likelihood applied to somebody who isn't playing the game currently, a purely practical concern not based on their behaviour and nothing personal... In other words, I think this was rather inoffensive. I'm hardly mocking them, I'm just spicing up a menial task with a more menial "Done" and replacing it with something a little less boring.

Tl;dr: I'm afraid I disagree.


Your boasting showing off how you are able to inactivate parties. Not cool dude.