Moderator: RP Committee
robmark0000 wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=640720
Let me know if you have to do anything with this.
Thank you in advance
Auditorii wrote:As a note, this decision is non-binding as it does have consent of both Moderators and is being made under some suspicious circumstances. We'll keep you informed!
jamescfm wrote:Auditorii wrote:As a note, this decision is non-binding as it does have consent of both Moderators and is being made under some suspicious circumstances. We'll keep you informed!
I have a few questions. Have the "suspicious circumstances" been investigated yet? Is the law still binding on players in Dorvik? Do you acknowledge that you were not supposed to unilaterally intervene in role-play laws affecting the country you played in? Should I expect to be banned again for asking these questions?
This appears fine and nothing that requires actual enforcement. It's good to gorobmark0000 wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=640720
Let me know if you have to do anything with this.
Thank you in advance
jamescfm wrote:Auditorii wrote:As a note, this decision is non-binding as it does have consent of both Moderators and is being made under some suspicious circumstances. We'll keep you informed!
I have a few questions. Have the "suspicious circumstances" been investigated yet? Is the law still binding on players in Dorvik? Do you acknowledge that you were not supposed to unilaterally intervene in role-play laws affecting the country you played in? Should I expect to be banned again for asking these questions?
Pharaoh wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=641090
Could i see that approved and recognised as valid?
also i would like to see appropiate changes,and recognition of this bill
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=641077
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests