Valdštejn wrote:Thanks for that, but it should have been pretty obvious that this says little to nothing about the interest in religion. All it says is which religions are there, and how many are part of them. It says nothing about how the people feel about religion in politics, nothing about who the people will vote for.
Really?
Religious influences: Primarily a diverse, and peaceful, three-way mix of Pagan (mostly Celtic Pagan), Christian (mostly Catholic), and Secular. A few small minorities exist too.
To me, that sounds like the citizens would be opposed to a single religion being mandatory (an optional variable of the state's policy on a national religion).
All the others seem as if the citizens wouldn't want religion to be banned (another optional variable of the state's policy on a national religion).
And please see the comments on this bill...
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=337956I could agree to Article 2 and other moderate articles in the future, but I will have to vote "no" against this bill as it violates Indralan tradition.
Indrala has numerous state religions which are more cultural symbols. Also, 90% of all Indralans are adherents of any one of those religions: Heaven Worship, Qamido, and Dharmism.
OOC: Seriously, I mean this. You can't change it anyways since it is protected by the cultural protocols, which contains the necessary statistics for religion
I remember it being addressed by Reiko (through the in-forum messaging), where the player messaged me to say I'd be violating cultural protocols if I proposed a bill to have no national religion...
Reiko wrote:No national religion could be a violation if done too hastily
There would be only 1 law I'd need to change for there to no longer be a national religion, so I don't see what the relevance of the word "hastily" is.