Particracy Forum

My party (http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... tyid=31845) the Parti Nationaliste's wiki link links to the Parti Nationaliste[SUN EMOJI] of Rildanor's page. If you could correct this and make it direct to https://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Natio ... Alduria%29 as well as making the wiki link https://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Parti_Nationaliste no longer direct to his page but instead to a page with links to both of our parties that would be great.

Good point, done

Sobk wrote:My party (http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... tyid=31845) the Parti Nationaliste's wiki link links to the Parti Nationaliste[SUN EMOJI] of Rildanor's page. If you could correct this and make it direct to https://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Natio ... Alduria%29 as well as making the wiki link https://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Parti_Nationaliste no longer direct to his page but instead to a page with links to both of our parties that would be great.

Will pass this on to our wiki admins

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7891&p=139724#p139724

lewiselder1 wrote:Plans to create political protocols are in the works

This caught my attention...could you expand a little more on this?

Aquinas wrote:http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7891&p=139724#p139724

lewiselder1 wrote:Plans to create political protocols are in the works

This caught my attention...could you expand a little more on this?

We're considering implementing something along these lines, eventually. After a proper consultation, of course.

Polites wrote:

Aquinas wrote:http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7891&p=139724#p139724

lewiselder1 wrote:Plans to create political protocols are in the works

This caught my attention...could you expand a little more on this?

We're considering implementing something along these lines, eventually. After a proper consultation, of course.

Yep, albeit not exactly like that -- the specifics are still undecided at this stage.

This again.

House Spencer wrote:This again.

Not sure what you mean.

cm9777 wrote:

House Spencer wrote:This again.

Not sure what you mean.

Follow the clues

1. Bachelot complains you not bothering to upkeep the CultPro Index

2. Lewis gives Baltusia a CultPro.

Now are the gears whirring into action yet??

Another thing http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=580471

Religion adds up to 102%

House Spencer wrote:

cm9777 wrote:

House Spencer wrote:This again.

Not sure what you mean.

Follow the clues

1. Bachelot complains you not bothering to upkeep the CultPro Index

2. Lewis gives Baltusia a CultPro.

Now are the gears whirring into action yet??

Another thing http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=580471

Religion adds up to 102%

Banned for uncivil discourse here and elsewhere continuously for several weeks with clear warnings and countless opportunities to resolve the issue and have your concerns listened to in both public and private. Will be reconsidered after a calm discussion, but we will not remove the ban so long as the discussion continues to be this nasty. The "this" link didn't lead to anything; there's no need to be so rude and unhelpful.

However, you have made fair points, despite framing them in the wrong way.

Namely, we have now updated the CulPro Index. In addition we are working on a resolution for the religion numbers, which admittedly I didn't notice. I would like to point out that the two day approval process is the best time to raise these concerns, but apologies for the mistakes there.

Thanks.

EDIT: "This" link did lead to a post, but just didn't work my end. Still the response was unacceptable given the context.