Moderator: RP Committee
Corvo Attano wrote:I read the rules and propose this updated protocols in Malivia
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=520280
The changes I made were introducing a small dundorfian community to follow our history and very small minorities of neighboring states in the demographics and small religious changes. The RP reason for not having this already is after the collapse and cultural shift the state was well collapsed and didn't do censuses correctly.
Old protocols
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=493848
MichaelV wrote:Perhaps usefull to send a working link indeed haha.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=520711
Reddy wrote:MichaelV wrote:Perhaps usefull to send a working link indeed haha.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=520711
You need do a clean pass of the bill instead of this web of confusing and misleading links leading to it.
Reddy wrote:Corvo Attano wrote:I read the rules and propose this updated protocols in Malivia
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=520280
The changes I made were introducing a small dundorfian community to follow our history and very small minorities of neighboring states in the demographics and small religious changes. The RP reason for not having this already is after the collapse and cultural shift the state was well collapsed and didn't do censuses correctly.
Old protocols
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=493848
Everything seems to be in order. You need to submit them again after you pass them.
Corvo Attano wrote:Reddy wrote:Corvo Attano wrote:I read the rules and propose this updated protocols in Malivia
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=520280
The changes I made were introducing a small dundorfian community to follow our history and very small minorities of neighboring states in the demographics and small religious changes. The RP reason for not having this already is after the collapse and cultural shift the state was well collapsed and didn't do censuses correctly.
Old protocols
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=493848
Everything seems to be in order. You need to submit them again after you pass them.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=520887
Everyone voted Aye.
MichaelV wrote:Reddy wrote:MichaelV wrote:Perhaps usefull to send a working link indeed haha.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=520711
You need do a clean pass of the bill instead of this web of confusing and misleading links leading to it.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=512338
Alright, I've done that.
The reason why I've made al those "misleading" bills, is that the upcoming cultural protocol then was on top of all the bills in debate fase and now it's not anymore, but I do understand why.
TheTsar wrote:Trigunian Cultural Protocol update:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=517729
Please may you approve this.
Thanks in advance.
16.5 As a general convention, players should be able to provide good reasons if they want to significantly change Cultural Protocols which are less than 30 in-game years old. Where the Cultural Protocols are more than 30 in-game years old, then a change to any of the categories by 5% or less will generally be accepted without question. If the changes proposed are between 5 and 10%, then players should be prepared for the possibility of having the changes queried. If the changes proposed are over 10%, then players should always expect to need to provide strong role-play justification for the changes. Changes of over 15% will never be accepted unless the grounds for justification are exceptional.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests