treaty problem

Report Particracy bugs here.

treaty problem

Postby Darkylightytwo » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:00 am

Hello, I have sign two treaty on the role on the media,

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2722
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2580

One of them only prevent the state from owning all media.
The other, the one I draft, forces all media to be non-profit cooperatives.

So I believe my state should only be able to vote on these two values

All radio stations are owned by independent non profit making cooperatives which are subsidised by the government
All radio stations are owned by independent non profit making cooperatives which receive no subsidies from the government

but someone could still make all media privates or most of them private, which would violate my own treaty. but the nation will be cosidered as having ratified it.
Darkylightytwo
 
Posts: 559
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:27 am

Re: treaty problem

Postby Amazeroth » Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:23 pm

Could you make a law violating the treaty, and linking to it (it doesn't have to be set to vote)?
Eines Tages traf Karl der Große eine alte Frau.
"Guten Tag, alte Frau", sagte Karl der Große.
"Guten Tag, Karl der Große", sagte die alte Frau.
Solche und ähnliche Geschichten erzählt man sich über die Leutseligkeit Karls des Großen.
User avatar
Amazeroth
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:28 pm
Location: Central Europe

Re: treaty problem

Postby Darkylightytwo » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:20 pm

no problem, I will do one. I just used all my quotas, but as soon as I get some' I will prouve it.


Image

Image
Darkylightytwo
 
Posts: 559
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:27 am

Re: treaty problem

Postby Darkylightytwo » Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:57 am

Bump to get attention
Darkylightytwo
 
Posts: 559
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:27 am

Re: treaty problem

Postby Amazeroth » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:27 pm

What you've posted alone isn't bugged - the proposals would never be greyed out or just not present, but you'd get an error message if you tried choosing them and clicked on "next".
Eines Tages traf Karl der Große eine alte Frau.
"Guten Tag, alte Frau", sagte Karl der Große.
"Guten Tag, Karl der Große", sagte die alte Frau.
Solche und ähnliche Geschichten erzählt man sich über die Leutseligkeit Karls des Großen.
User avatar
Amazeroth
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:28 pm
Location: Central Europe

Re: treaty problem

Postby Darkylightytwo » Sun Sep 14, 2014 1:02 am

Amazeroth wrote:What you've posted alone isn't bugged - the proposals would never be greyed out or just not present, but you'd get an error message if you tried choosing them and clicked on "next".


No, I did not get an error message,
The other day, conservatives present bil with proposal that would violate treaties and look at this bill, I have just present a bill that violate the treaty I presented.
it clear the my law are binding according to less restrictive treaty and not the most restrictive treaty, .
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=417281, I just present a law that will allow commercial whalling. and I could even vote on it.

and this law, the conservative was able to put a law that violate a treaty to the vote. http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=417130
Darkylightytwo
 
Posts: 559
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:27 am

Re: treaty problem

Postby Amazeroth » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:16 am

I've informed Wouter.
Eines Tages traf Karl der Große eine alte Frau.
"Guten Tag, alte Frau", sagte Karl der Große.
"Guten Tag, Karl der Große", sagte die alte Frau.
Solche und ähnliche Geschichten erzählt man sich über die Leutseligkeit Karls des Großen.
User avatar
Amazeroth
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:28 pm
Location: Central Europe

Re: treaty problem

Postby LvdT » Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:34 pm

I have a similar problem, Kanjor is a member of these treaties:

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2715
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2716
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2872

each with its own provisions regarding the state religion law. Only the "softest" terms appear to be enforced, I have created a bill (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=425116) where I have overridden the terms of the Secularist and Atheist International by choosing "There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary".

I am not sure if it's actually the softest terms that get implemented, or if it's because the treaty with the softest terms appear first in the list.
LvdT
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 7:40 am


Return to Bug Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron