Moderator: RP Committee
Govenor12 wrote:So in general if things are like that the description of the law is simply seen as not relevant and consequently without any rp impact?
which is the definition of an RP law according to Rule 22
Govenor12 wrote:which is the definition of an RP law according to Rule 22
Based on that i move that the following laws:
1. http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=546594
2. http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=546947
3. http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=548690
do not compley with the following rules:
22.5 It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.
22.8 In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity.
I hereby challenge their validity.
In case of law no.1 i additionally refer to 22.3.3 "There must be a clear mechanism through which a RP law can be overthrown.", because it introduces a new armband law.
Laws outlined in bill descriptions but not specified in game mechanic proposals are known as "role-play laws" or "RP laws" and are recognised under the rules as binding.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest