I think I can assist Moderation in solving this entire issue; theres a few inherit powers that Moderation have and the Game Rules specific.
Number one and overall is this:
"Due to the changing nature of the game and its community Moderation reserve the right to make exceptions to the rules in exceptional circumstances."The second overall is:
"6(a) Role Play is a large part of Particracy, however it is not compulsory and as a general rule the game mechanics always “come first.”"So prior to ANY of the rules located in 6(3)(I)/(II)/(III) these two rules persist. I do however agree that Moderation should clarify these rules because they can get a little confusing.
E. Role-play Laws
(I) In order to first create an RP Law it must be labeled as such. In order to label an RP Law properly it must either be named as such in the title ("bill title"), in the comments section of the bill during it's initial posting or an OOC portion of the bill description;
(II) RP Laws that are non-constitutional it must pass by a simple majority of seats; if it is a constitutional law or a law that grants extraordinary (dictatorial, very specific, etc.) powers it must have a ⅔ majority of seats;
(III) RP Laws must be referenced or a copy placed in the "Bills Under Debate" section, this is done for reference. If an RP Law is not posted within 30 days of of passage, the RP Law is considered invalid;
(IV) In order to overturn or abolish RP you must pass a bill with a simple majority voting for the revocation which provides a link to the original passage of the law and states that it is being repealed. The revocation bill should be then placed in the "RP Law Dismissal Thread" in order to be judged if needbe;
(V) RP Laws should generally not contradict game mechanics and cannot directly contravene game rules, this does not mean that Moderation will not accept RP Laws that do that. Any RP Law that might go against either of these can be judged in the "RP Law Query Thread" which Moderation and the GRC can provide input and Moderation will provide a final ruling;
(VI) RP Laws cannot ban certain political party types (ideologies, religions, etc.) without considerable RP justification, RP Laws cannot ban specific users from nations, RP Laws cannot force users to act a certain way OOC, RP Laws cannot be used to vote a particular way with the exception of: mandatory early elections triggered by a percentage of seats being vacant (this section can be amended by Moderation to include the ever changing scope of RP Laws);
(VII) Moderation reserves the right to declare RP Laws valid or invalid in exceptional circumstances.
I offer Moderation these to adopt wholly or with specific parts. As a former Moderator myself I understand the complexities that present themselves in these situations and I remind ALL users that at the end of the day Moderation has, had and always will reserve the right to enforce, make, remove and otherwise manage the game and it's rule as they see fit.