Requests: RP Laws [RPC]

Submit your requests on various areas of the game.

Moderator: RP Committee

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Auditorii » Sat Jan 26, 2019 12:21 am

Maxington wrote:Hi, is it possible to use an RP Law to ban militias and impose restrictions on firearms use?


In theory, yes. You could make this possible via RP Laws, in-game variables, as well as the relevant background. Is there a specific case or question?
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Maxington » Sat Jan 26, 2019 12:41 am

well I've had a firearms control act in Kazulmark for sometime and i did some anti-gun RP prior. I wanted to know whether it was valid or not?
"The future of the Nation is in the children's school bags" ~ Dr. Eric Williams
President of the Trond Henrichsen Institute for International Affairs.
User avatar
Maxington
 
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: Look Behind you.

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Aquinas » Mon Jan 28, 2019 12:54 pm

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592478

Image

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592191

The player in Deltaria is using an OOC RP law reference bill in order to misinform players that their party name has to be "in Czech as the CP states".

This specification is not even mentioned in the linked RP law itself. It is not clear as to whether this would be allowed anyway, because players are meant to be able to list their party names in English.
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Rogue » Mon Jan 28, 2019 1:28 pm

Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=592478

Image

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592191

The player in Deltaria is using an OOC RP law reference bill in order to misinform players that their party name has to be "in Czech as the CP states".

This specification is not even mentioned in the linked RP law itself. It is not clear as to whether this would be allowed anyway, because players are meant to be able to list their party names in English.


The wording has been changed to "preferably in czech" as you were right it could have been seen as forcing a player to name it in czech
Playing in:

Istapali
User avatar
Rogue
 
Posts: 4218
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:11 pm

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby thefalloutfan101 » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:34 pm

Just wondering if I have achieved appropriate RP justification for my blanket ban of several parties, found here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592826

I have crafted over two weeks of justification for said law via rp posts, found here in Dundorf's news thread, which continues onto the next page: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6725&start=460#p145410

Thanks.
Active in: New Verham (Primary Controller)

Current Member of the Roleplay Committee

"One may become a demagogue out of sheer political innocence." - Vladimir Lenin
User avatar
thefalloutfan101
 
Posts: 603
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:56 pm
Location: Baatrynsentii, New Verham (IC) Florida, United States (OOC)

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Auditorii » Thu Jan 31, 2019 12:53 am

thefalloutfan101 wrote:Just wondering if I have achieved appropriate RP justification for my blanket ban of several parties, found here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592826

I have crafted over two weeks of justification for said law via rp posts, found here in Dundorf's news thread, which continues onto the next page: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6725&start=460#p145410

Thanks.


I'll have a review of this with the GRC and we'll get back to you ASAP!
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Auditorii » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:32 pm

thefalloutfan101 wrote:Just wondering if I have achieved appropriate RP justification for my blanket ban of several parties, found here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592826

I have crafted over two weeks of justification for said law via rp posts, found here in Dundorf's news thread, which continues onto the next page: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6725&start=460#p145410

Thanks.


Apologies for the delay, due the numerous factors, we've decided to approve your RP justification for a blanket ban on parties. It's great to see you took time to lay a credible backstory and some ancillary RP with it. Thank you!
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Aquinas » Fri Feb 15, 2019 12:25 am

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592798

The RP law above, which was passed after the new rules came in, and is referenced in Kafuristan's RP laws reference bill, has not been submitted to this thread for review, as per the new Game Rules:

5d. RP laws that grant extraordinary powers, ban specific parties or ideologies, create one-party states, grant or allow powers that might not be granted by normal game mechanics or otherwise authorize dictatorial or executive authority must be posted HERE for review by Moderation and the Global Roleplay Committee. Please note that RP law approvals may take sometime and Moderation and the GRC will respond as promptly as possible;


As can be seen from the bill discussion, the other player in Kafuristan questioned whether this RP law was legitimate under the rules, which makes it seem all the more unusual that Auditorii did not submit it to this thread, as the rules require.
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Auditorii » Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:00 pm

Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=592798

The RP law above, which was passed after the new rules came in, and is referenced in Kafuristan's RP laws reference bill, has not been submitted to this thread for review, as per the new Game Rules:

5d. RP laws that grant extraordinary powers, ban specific parties or ideologies, create one-party states, grant or allow powers that might not be granted by normal game mechanics or otherwise authorize dictatorial or executive authority must be posted HERE for review by Moderation and the Global Roleplay Committee. Please note that RP law approvals may take sometime and Moderation and the GRC will respond as promptly as possible;


As can be seen from the bill discussion, the other player in Kafuristan questioned whether this RP law was legitimate under the rules, which makes it seem all the more unusual that Auditorii did not submit it to this thread, as the rules require.


I appreciate you’re vigilante patrolling of the game. Truth be told, I’ve been overly busy and I never posted it. Simple facts of IRL :(

But since you’ve included the link. I’ll ask for my fellow GRC members to review and approve.
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: RP Law Query Thread

Postby Aquinas » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:39 pm

Auditorii wrote:
Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=592798

The RP law above, which was passed after the new rules came in, and is referenced in Kafuristan's RP laws reference bill, has not been submitted to this thread for review, as per the new Game Rules:

5d. RP laws that grant extraordinary powers, ban specific parties or ideologies, create one-party states, grant or allow powers that might not be granted by normal game mechanics or otherwise authorize dictatorial or executive authority must be posted HERE for review by Moderation and the Global Roleplay Committee. Please note that RP law approvals may take sometime and Moderation and the GRC will respond as promptly as possible;


As can be seen from the bill discussion, the other player in Kafuristan questioned whether this RP law was legitimate under the rules, which makes it seem all the more unusual that Auditorii did not submit it to this thread, as the rules require.


I appreciate you’re vigilante patrolling of the game. Truth be told, I’ve been overly busy and I never posted it. Simple facts of IRL :(

But since you’ve included the link. I’ll ask for my fellow GRC members to review and approve.


Any update?
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

PreviousNext

Return to Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron