Auditorii wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewcabinet.php?nationid=38
Annnnndddd CP violation.
Player messaged
Moderator: RP Committee
Auditorii wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewcabinet.php?nationid=38
Annnnndddd CP violation.
Mr.God wrote:Auditorii wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=592749
This is an update to Kafuristans current CP.
Waiting for the 48 hours
Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=591888
There is a Cultural Protocol reference bill sitting in Pontesi's bills-under-debate section, giving the impression it is the official Cultural Protocol, despite the fact Pontesi is actually Culturally Open.
BTW the rules previously insisted on CP reference bills including links to the Game Rules, the Cultural Protocols Index and the CP bill that was passed by players and approved by Moderation. This was precisely in order to reduce the likelihood of confusion being created by non-official/misleading CP reference bills.
Mr.God wrote:Edmund wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewcabinet.php?nationid=16
It's all Greek to me.
Messaged player
Edmund wrote:Mr.God wrote:Edmund wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewcabinet.php?nationid=16
It's all Greek to me.
Messaged player
No changes.
Aquinas wrote:Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=591888
There is a Cultural Protocol reference bill sitting in Pontesi's bills-under-debate section, giving the impression it is the official Cultural Protocol, despite the fact Pontesi is actually Culturally Open.
BTW the rules previously insisted on CP reference bills including links to the Game Rules, the Cultural Protocols Index and the CP bill that was passed by players and approved by Moderation. This was precisely in order to reduce the likelihood of confusion being created by non-official/misleading CP reference bills.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=590853
Same issue in Darnussia.
FrostPegasus wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=591888 although it was recently archived, does this mean it was approved, or not?
Was approved with:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=593122
Based on the previous cultural protocol that was removed/abandoned:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=462601
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests