I believe Lodamun (maybe), Valruzia and Vanuku might have had a hand in this and as of right now, their possibility of involvement is their own decision. I shall note for future reference that the GRC generally sees civil wars that involve foreign powers and civil wars where there is wide scale attacks/sabotage or other armed conflict as a major event, especially one where multiple foreign countries are getting involved and as per the new RP rules underneath Section 6:
-- 2a. Players are required to pass a bill authorizing the RP which must be passed by a majority of players with seats within the nation (for major, large-scale roleplays such as civil wars, wars, significant economic or RP-related political reforms, etc.) Players are required to create an OOC RP planning bill or forum post discussing the general outline and discussion for planned RP; it needs to include a link to the passed RP authorization bill (for all players);
-- 2b. Players who engage with RP via newspaper posts, in-game messages or other forms of in-character communications are generally accepted to be consenting to the RP. In the event that consent or authorization comes into question, players who have engaged will be counted as voting for or authorizing the RP.
While I understand there was some issues with the initial ruling, the GRC is committed to making sure that RP is carried out both realistically and in a manner that is fun and fair to everyone else. We try not to legislate and bother too much with certain situations until they are brought to our attention or they feature some grey area that might potentially be a problem in the future. Thanks everyone!