Auditorii wrote:ChengherRares1 wrote:I ask admins if this issue is valid. I had an argument with Luis1p whether my huge sums of moneys are valid from RP. I know they were the number of trillions, but we think that this
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8446&start=10#p147276 and the fact that budget is taken into account we think Luis1p attempt to report my party on the basis of wrong RP despite my RP said clearly those sums of mooneys are split between more years than one and also there are big projects. We believe current sums are not justifiable for the ammount of years and importance. There is also question whatever the exchange rate regime (
http://classic.particracy.net/rates.php) and if the budget and GDP are valid. If they are valid as in the comment of Keymon
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8446&start=10#p147276 the budget was clearly taken into account. I ask admins to say whether trillions are an acceptable sum for CHR money from the view that this money are inflated based on stock exchanges and GDP of the nation. I want a clear answer.
The answer is not from Luis as a player, it is from the Global Roleplay Committee supported by Moderation. So, in short to answer your question, yes, decisions by the GRC are valid. From what I’ve read and been shared with myself and Moderation, we’ve explained very well and provided examples to why your RP is unrealistic. Please note, continued non-compliance can result in inactivation fo your account.
Are GRC/Moderation seriously now getting into the micromanagement of trying to regulate the monetary amounts players use in economic RP?
I find this questionable, not least because the economic dimension to Particracy Classic was never completed, and even the in-game economics pages say "This is a feature under development, do not consider it working yet!" right at the top in red letters.
Reading through Hulstria's recent news posts, I found a reference to
"400 trillions money for this projects of furthering our national cause of gay liberation", and another reference to the government giving an agricultural company
"over one trillion HCR as funds for their crop". One can make an argument that these figures are excessive, when it is considered that
according to Hulstria's in-game economics page, Hulstria's GDP is only 2.6 trillion HCR.
However, given that the in-game economics is not properly working and most players do not even take the in-game economic statistics entirely seriously anyway, I find it rather heavy-handed to threaten players with inactivation unless they use whatever numbers GRC/Moderation arbitrarily decides are acceptable. The game has not been regulated like this in the past. I have often seen players use figures which, when compared with the in-game economics statistics, might look unrealistic, but (along with most people, I think) I've generally ignored this, simply on the basis the economic game mechanics aren't working properly anyway. To give some examples, less than 3 months ago, Mr. God made a reference to a Deltarian company being worth
"600 billion LOD (12 trillion DTE)", despite the fact that according to
Deltaria's economics page, Deltaria's entire GDP is worth only 5 trillion DTE. Similarly, in August last year, Auditorii made a reference to Dorvik donating
"nearly $1 trillion LOD into Dovani and post-Dovani War nations", an amount which looks excessive when one considers that figure is more than 3 times Lodamun's entire GDP.
With respect, I am a little disappointed by the attitude Auditorii has demonstrated towards Chengher, both here in this thread, where he has publicly threatened him with inactivation, and also on the official public Discord server, where earlier in the week he inaccurately and unhelpfully described Chengher's work in Hulstria as "a blatant troll attempt". It would be nice if GRC/Moderation could try to adopt a more positive and constructive approach towards players, particularly towards those who are new to Particracy RP.