Moderator: RP Committee
jamescfm wrote:When can I expect that the suggestions will be implemented?
jamescfm wrote:Your prior message does not answer my direct question. For the third time, when can I expect that the suggestions will be implemented?
As I said, I am dropping everything I have to do for the game in order to update this guide...
jamescfm wrote:You have informed me via Discord that the changes have been made. I am not sure why you did not do this in the thread but that's fine. You have chosen to list "Hulstria" for Hulstria and Gao-Soto. As has already been made clear to you in my original thread, the consensus opinion based on a significant amount of historic role-play is that the country's primary name should be "Hulstria and Gao-Soto". In its current form, the Guide does not even mention "Gao-Soto". What basis is there for using "Hulstria" rather than "Hulstria and Gao-Soto", aside from your personal preference for excluding the role-play related to Gao-Soto? There's also the listing of "Hawu-Ikradon" and "Indrala" being used as the primary names for the relevant countries but given the immense effort it took to get to this point, I almost don't feel like going through the process again...
jamescfm wrote:Despite that you're feigning ignorance, it is clear that you do have a personal preference, as you made clear in the thread that I have already linked to. This is the reason I suspect your initial decision to exclude Gao-Soto was a matter of personal preference. I am glad that you were able to recognise the consensus view in the end.
Hulstria is a little trickier and I think has some personal issues for players.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests