Mr.God wrote:Mr.God wrote:I appreciate the response and think its much more clear now. I will accept the denial, since continuing to appeal it is obviously not the right thing to do. I would like to ask though. What nation would i go to for a RP that i mentioned i wanted to do with Midway? You say that generally first world involvement is discouraged in the TW these days. Does that mean i cant do that RP in any of the TW nations? I was largely inspired by the likes of France and Great britain when requesting the RP in Midway. That being their continued influence in their former colonies (france using economics and the power of their language AKA soft power) and britain in a more direct way (through the commonwealth of nations etc). Same with the US, while they arguably hold much less influence in the middle east then they used to they still wield some. Generally i agree that random conflicts are counterproductive and seem less realistic, thats the reason why i layed out a detailed plan for Midway since i do not intend for a simple "invasion" of a country and no RP after. I intend on staying involved in the TW, not merely with my First world nation, but as a true third world player.
I would like to ask what nation would be suitable for a RP i layed out. Thank you
Still waiting on a response to this after 3 days.
As I stated in my post located here, we're having some internal discussions regarding our own thoughts behind playable nations and TW nations and right now we're going to scale back from having player nations play a significant influence (as you've proposed) in TW nations. Until then, this will remain really remain denied.