Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Say your piece, make suggestions and offer feedback to any aspect of the game.

Moderator: RP Committee

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby jamescfm » Fri Nov 20, 2020 1:13 am

Summary of the Dynamic Rankings update for 20 November 2020. Please let us know if you have any queries or feedback in this thread.

Economic rankings

Istalia and Vascania upgraded to "very strong"
Dorvik and Yingdala downgraded to "strong"
Badara, Selucia and Trigunia upgraded to "strong"
Dolgava, Istapali, Jakania, Kalistan, Seko and Vanuku downgraded to "average"
Cildania, Davostan, Kundrati, Liore and Rildanor upgraded to "average"
New Englia downgraded to "weak"
Rapa Pile upgraded to "weak"

Military and influence rankings

Istalia and Vascania upgraded to "great power"
Dorvik and Hutori downgraded to "regional power"
Endralon, Liore and Trigunia upgraded to "regional power"
Dolgava and Jakania downgraded to "middle power"
Badara, Cildania, Davostan, Kundrati, Rildanor and Selucia upgraded to "middle power"
Dundorf, Kalopia, New Alduria and New Englia downgraded to "small power"
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5476
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby robmark0000 » Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:56 am

These rankings about Endralon are fine for me.
Information: Player Profile here, Musical Profile here, Political Compass here.
World Congress Coordinator

"Only the Young can run. So run, and run, and run!" ~ Taylor Swift
User avatar
robmark0000
 
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:12 am
Location: Hungary / Magyarország (my liberal soul is in prison here, big big sadness)

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby NuclearGandhi69 » Wed Feb 10, 2021 3:28 pm

Do you think you could upgrade Narikaton and Darnussia's economy to strong
NuclearGandhi69
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:50 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby jamescfm » Wed Feb 10, 2021 3:49 pm

NuclearGandhi69 wrote:Do you think you could upgrade Narikaton and Darnussia's economy to strong

Rankings are updated at semi-regular intervals, we don't usually change the ranking of individual countries. At the moment, we hope to have a new update in a couple of weeks. For Narikaton and Darnussia to be considered for an upgrade, it would need to have evidence of being role-played as such in line with your "assessment criteria".
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5476
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby NuclearGandhi69 » Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:58 am

Sure no problem
NuclearGandhi69
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:50 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby jamescfm » Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:56 pm

Summary of the Dynamic Rankings update for 12 February 2021.

Economic rankings

Deltaria, Istalia and Vascania downgraded to "strong"
Davostan and Liore upgraded to "strong"
Ostland downgraded to "average"
Aldegar and Lourenne upgraded to "average"
Cobura, Husltria and Gao-Soto, Jelbania, Kafuristan, Likatonia, Medina and Midway downgraded to "weak"
Bazgaristan, New Englia, New Verham, Rapa Pile, Suyu Llaqta and Utari Mosir downgraded to "underdeveloped"


Military and influence rankings

Deltaria, Istalia, Vascania and Yingdala downgraded to "regional power"
Badara, Davostan and Dolgava upgraded to "regional power"
Ostland and Vanuku downgraded to "middle power"
Aldegar, Gaduridos, Lodamun and Lourenne upgraded to "middle power"
Hulstria and Gao-Soto, Istapali, Jelbania, Kafuristan, Kizenia and New Endralon and Likatonia downgraded to "small power"
Bianjie, Kurageri, New Englia, New Verham, North Dovani, Noumonde, Rapa Pile, Statrica, Suyu Llaqta and Utari Mosir downgraded to "limited power"
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5476
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby Rogue » Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:37 pm

No comments on the new rankings. I think they are balanced enough.

Would just like to request moderation to be more pro-active with updating the voluntary rankings. The original intend for the dynamic system was more frequent and "dynamic" changes. I would suggest having that be reflected in the future.
Playing in:

Istapali
User avatar
Rogue
 
Posts: 4224
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:11 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby jamescfm » Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:30 pm

Mr.God wrote:No comments on the new rankings. I think they are balanced enough.

Would just like to request moderation to be more pro-active with updating the voluntary rankings. The original intend for the dynamic system was more frequent and "dynamic" changes. I would suggest having that be reflected in the future.

The objective of Moderation is to update the rankings around every three months. In this case we wanted to allow a little time after the Rapa Pile conflict to let the international landscape settle before making changes. Moderation has no intention at present of increasing the frequency of the dynamic rankings, we don't think the game is active enough to warrant this and the process consumes considerable portions of our time. If players feel strongly that the rankings should be more frequent then we can consider changing this in future, I'd suggest discussing this in the thread that deals more generally with the rankings.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5476
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby Rogue » Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:03 pm

I come back on my no comment. Just found out Istapali was downranked to a small power. something i definitely dont agree with. I would like to hear the reasoning behind this decision.
Playing in:

Istapali
User avatar
Rogue
 
Posts: 4224
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:11 pm

Re: Feedback: Dynamic Rankings

Postby jamescfm » Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:16 pm

Mr.God wrote:I come back on my no comment. Just found out Istapali was downranked to a small power. something i definitely dont agree with. I would like to hear the reasoning behind this decision.

Istapali had been almost completely inactive for several years before you arrived in the country. The decision to downgrade it was not a reflection of the country's military power deteriorating but more that we felt it was too highly ranked to begin with.

If you compare it to other countries in the "average power" category, most have at least some recent history of notable military and political influence whereas Istapali does not. Lots of countries were in a similar position and dropped down a category in this update and that was partly due to the introduction of the new "limited power".
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5476
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Feedback

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests