SC R109: International maritime law

Archive of World Congress resolutions.

Moderator: RP Committee

SC R109: International maritime law

Postby Polites » Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:59 am

Security Council Resolution 109

The Security Council,

Recognizing the importance of maritime trade for global peace and prosperity,

Affirming the impossibility of any nation to claim the high seas or any part thereof as its national territory,

Condemning the vile practices of piracy and slavery,

Recognizing the existence of admiralty law as a part of customary international law,

Proclaims the Law of the Sea as jus cogens, peremptory norm that is applicable erga omnes, to all states, whether they are party to the treaty or not,

Declares all bodies of water not included in the Territorial waters or Exclusive Economic Zone as the High Seas, and proclaims that all vessels sailing the High Seas are under the jurisdiction and protection of their flag state,

Proclaims the High Seas the common patrimony of all humanity and all nations,

Asserts that pirates and slavers, by engaging in private war against all nations or by trafficking slaves on the High Seas, render themselves hostes humani generis, enemies of the human race, and holds that all nations have the right and the duty to capture, try, and, if their laws permit it, execute any pirate and slaver they come across,

Recognizes the ancient custom of privateering and proclaims it distinct from piracy, recognizing that privateers are at war with only one nation, not all nations.


Yes: Selucia; Aldegar; Liore; Dorvik
No:
Abstain: Dankuk

The resolution was adopted.
Polites
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: SC R109: International Maritime Law

Postby Polites » Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:00 am

Image Senator Hieronymus Gennadius, envoy of the Selucian Senate to the World Congress:

Selucia votes YES on Security Council Resolution 109
Polites
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: SC R109: International Maritime Law

Postby jamescfm » Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:36 pm

Image Mr. Mönkhbat Ong, Aldegarian Permanent Representative to the World Congress:
Aldegar votes YES to Security Council Resolution 109.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5661
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: SC R109: International Maritime Law

Postby ChitinKal » Wed Jan 13, 2021 4:34 pm

Msia Ironsi, World Congress Representative of the Socialist State of Liore
Liore votes YES on this resolution.
RP Controller of Liore
Fronto de Aŭgustana Vekiĝo (Zardugal) (Inactive) link
Mare Unitu (Keymon) (Inactive) link
Ár Náisiún (Kirlawa) (Inactive) link
National Conservative Party (Kalistan) (Inactive) link
User avatar
ChitinKal
 
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:10 pm

Re: SC R109: International Maritime Law

Postby Wu Han » Wed Jan 13, 2021 5:39 pm

In this Kyo name, the family name is "Bae."
Image Ms. Bae Yoo-bin, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Dranian Permanent Representative to the World Congress:
Respectfully, Dankuk shall ABSTAIN from voting on Security Council Resolution 109.

Our delegation is concerned with the assertion of the resolution, namely that states have a duty to execute such criminals so long as their laws permit it. As a nation opposed to capital punishment, though supportive of the aims of the resolution, Dankuk is conflicted. We recognize our own shortcomings in not raising these concerns earlier.
(he/him)
Current: Cildania
Former: Listed Here
User avatar
Wu Han
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 10:51 am
Location: Still running up that hill

Re: SC R109: International Maritime Law

Postby Auditorii » Wed Jan 13, 2021 6:31 pm

Image Klemens Wieseltier, General-Plenipotentiary to the World Congress, Kingdom of Dorvik
"The Kingdom of Dorvik votes AYE on this proposal."
Trigunia (17 March Committee)
Controller of Mina
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6413
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: SC R109: International Maritime Law

Postby jamescfm » Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:51 pm

Image Ms. Annabelle O'Horan, General-Secretary of the World Congress:
Voting has now concluded on Resolution 109. The result was four votes in favour and no votes against, with one abstention. The resolution was adopted.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5661
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm


Return to Resolutions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests