Dorkyland wrote:You know Mr. Yankees, being one-party ultimately powerful isn't any fun at all...
Mr.Yankees wrote:Dorkyland wrote:You know Mr. Yankees, being one-party ultimately powerful isn't any fun at all...
Depends what your definition of fun is. It also depends on how much you like to be in power all by yourself.
AngryMollusc wrote:Mr.Yankees wrote:Dorkyland wrote:You know Mr. Yankees, being one-party ultimately powerful isn't any fun at all...
Depends what your definition of fun is. It also depends on how much you like to be in power all by yourself.
There are advantages and disadvantages. It's great if you're more interested in RP, but if you like a challenge its pretty tedious. I can never stand it for long
Mr.Yankees wrote:AngryMollusc wrote:Mr.Yankees wrote:Depends what your definition of fun is. It also depends on how much you like to be in power all by yourself.
There are advantages and disadvantages. It's great if you're more interested in RP, but if you like a challenge its pretty tedious. I can never stand it for long
To add to that: It's also kind of difficult to be in absolute power for a long time. No matter what technique you use, it takes time.
Hey, George, look at the positive side of it: You don't have people annoying you with tons of bills in your country.
AngryMollusc wrote:Not really. If you know a few tricks (having somebody who can back you up every month or so is useful), you can sustain yourself pretty near indefinitely, with almost no effort.
Certainly, its not nearly as entertaining a challenge as seizing a nation against entrenched opposition.
Edit: well, for me at least. You may well think differently.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests