Sorry, you may have to clarify what you’re inquiring about here
HBulow wrote:lewiselder1 wrote:Moderation will not be debating on this issue in public any further, for the reasons I have explained repeatedly.
Because you lost the argument and can't admit it so can only save face by hiding behind "confidentiality" (
) and Wouter (
).
lewiselder1 wrote:We are always happy to take feedback on board.
Only if it suits you else you shut it down and sanction the speaker.
lewiselder1 wrote:I apologise for any offence caused on my part, though I believe that I have only called for people to calm down and stop arguing so aggressively over Particracy
He says sorry then says he "only called for people to calm down and stop arguing so aggressively over Particracy" when he's the one who forced a player out of Jelbania who just wanted to play the game,
branded us a bunch of dicks, made aggressive threats, flaunted his power to inactivate us by making
revolting comments about gulags and now has the chutzpah to tell
us to calm down.
lewiselder1 wrote:Still, you’re entitled to your opinion.
Provided it aint different from your own.
There is a reason this bollox is going on = the attitude of the Mods.
#endthisnonsense
#scrapRPlaws
#gamemechanicsfirst
#giveusourgameback
Moderation will no longer be publicly debating the House Spencer case with individuals who do not know the full story and are not able to have a fair debate or act appropriately. We are happy now and have always been happy to give Spencer the opportunity to peacefully explain his concerns privately and come to a resolution and he did not wish to do so. There is not much else we can do. We have no issue with House Spencer as a person and want to reach a resolution as much as he. Trust me, I would like to retort with the evidence and facts we have to hand. But to do so would be inappropriate for numerous reasons. Please let House Spencer know he is always free to contact Wouter again and take up the discussion if he would like. We never walked away from the conversation.
Please do not expect any further correspondence in public on the matter. If you would like to discuss it privately with us feel free to contact us.
As for the string of accusations against myself, I am free to respond there in full.
We nation banned Spencer for knowingly ignoring and intervening in valid RP, trolling, acting inappropriately in private correspondence and on the forums; we were perfectly entitled to do so, Spencer had broken the rules of the game. Could Spencer have been informed of the situation earlier? Absolutely, which we have recognised and apologised for. Does it impact our ruling at all? No.
I have already apologised for the ‘dicks’ comment, though I would like to stress it was not a specific reference to anyone and instead was a reference to the generally unproductive and aggressive ethos of the debate.
I have not made any aggressive remarks to my knowledge.
I have apologised separately in public for the gulag comments which were just foolish jokes on my behalf and have taken your point very seriously. I’m not sure how better I was meant to respond in this situation.
You have received a formal warning for your post on the Moderation queries thread, and I stress this again. This is not the appropriate forum or the appropriate way of going around this debate. All we ask is that you speak calmly and productively.
Moderation will no longer be responding to aggressive responses on this matter.
I go by Ashley now and use she/her pronouns. This is a really old account, I don’t play now.
I was a mod in classic for a bit, then I helped make Marcapada and WM there for a while. As of 2020 I’m co-ordinating Pachapay’s development.